For a long time, I have harbored a deep impression that, for all their evil and stupidity and spite, the forces of reactionary conservatism, conformity, and opposition to social progress are, essentially, child-like.

When you think about it, the desire to suppress individuality, freedom, and diversity is essentially a desire to force the world to be like you thought it was when you were a kid, before you learned that the world was a far more complicated, scary, and dangerous place than they ever could have known when they were small.

No wonder these people have such a huge problem with sexuality. Their entire philosophy is essentially a rejection of adolescence. In our teen years, we get the balance of our sexuality and sexual development, and the balance of our mental and psychological development as well. We lose our childlike innocent and become painfully cognizant of the world outside our little slice of the universe. We find out just how big the world is, and how small we are.

Social conservatives are simply people who have failed to make the transition to a mature adult acceptance of these truths, and instead, like mad gods, seek to cut the world down to size until it fits into their immature minds, rather than expand their minds to include the real world.

If you have to expand your mind one iota, the terrorists have won.

The true crux of the tragedy, of course, is that they, as hard as this is to believe, actually think that the world really was like they thought it was as a child. They think that it really was a safe, nice, gentle, orderly world where bad things never happened and everything was wonderful all the time. They lack the most basic of faculties required to grasp the world : the simple ability to recognize we were wrong in the past, and we know better now.

Often, these are people who cannot ever admit being wrong about anything, ever. Like the child who continues to insist he did not take a cookie from the cookie jar when the cookie is right there in his hand, they have a magical faith that if they don’t admit it’s true, it’s not true. That’s how naive these people truly are, and how philosophically bankrupt. They think and act as though their personal reality is reality, and therefore if they never admit they were wrong and never believe they were wrong, they were never wrong, period.

Doesn’t that sounds like an angry and spoiled child to you?

If you can’t even grasp that when you were a child, you were ignorant of the world and unable to really grasp it and hence got a false impression of its nature through no fault of your own, you are tragically and vastly under-equipped to handle even the most basic hurdles of adult life.

And to compound their ignorance, these failed adults don’t just think life really was like they thought it was when they were kids, they think the world was like how they remember it being, after the transition to adulthood and many painful years of responsibility and obligation have caused nostalgia to wipe away all the bad parts of childhood and make them think that when they were kids, everything was great all the time, and hence, something must have changed in the world since then.

Of course, nothing has changed all that much in the world. They just grew up… or failed to do so.

But no, it must be the world that has changed. After all, they have never been wrong in their life, even when they were barely old enough to walk upright. Logically speaking, it’s the world’s fault.

And doesn’t this explain a great deal about conservatives in general? The incoherent anger is just a temper tantrum on the adult scale. They think they can bully reality into being what they want it to be if they just shout loud enough and stomp their feet and hold their breath till they turn blue.

And the more evil old reality creeps in as their fragile and ridiculous world view is steadily eroded by sanity, reason, and that part of their mind which is still trying to grow up, the louder they shout and the harder they stomp their feet and the tighter they plug their airs, and the greater the pain they experience from the massive cognitive dissonance they are so tightly repressing. This enormous conflict grows and grows over time, like an infected tumour, and as it grows, it gets more and more tender and sensitive, so that even the slightest breeze of disagreement across its surface hurts so bad that all they can do is scream and lash out in primal rage at the thing that hurts them and try to KILL IT KILL IT MAKE IT STOP!

So the next time some rabid ranting ridiculous right winger is making you want to commit a very un-liberal act of violence upon their person, just remember that they can’t really help themselves.

They are just little children, after all.

OK, first off, let’s talk about the trip to Mars that is taking place right now.

Granted, it’s a simulated trip, and all the crew members are staying right here on Earth. But other than that little detail, the experiment is rigged to simulate the problems of a trip to Mars as faithfully as possible… including locking the crew into their metal capsule for six month there and six months back.

So far, no murders from SPACE MADNESS.

The idea is that they will, in simulation, make the trip there for six months, assume orbit on Feb 1, land on Feb 12 and spend the next two days exploring a simulated Mars surface, and then get back in the metal box for the six month journey back home.

They can communicate via email and video messages, but those are realistically delayed in order to simulate the effect of speed of light delays as the Mars capsule gets further and further from Earth.

One thing I like about this experiment is that it is highly useful science, and yet, low budget. NASA style spending is a thing of the past, and modern space programs are, quite rightly, focusing more on making space flight practical and affordable, rather than throwing enormous amounts of resources into flashy projects that prove what we already know : that it can be done.

We are past the explorer period of space flight, and far overdue for the practical era, where space flight is made as rational and reasonable as airline travel.

I have to note, though, that there is a flaw in their experimental model. It’s unavoidable, but still, it makes one wonder what the real usability of the data will be.

The thing is, the “crew members” all know, deep down, that they are on Earth and if anything bad happened they could be out of the experiment in a moment. That won’t be true in space, and I think the knowledge that rescue is as close as the next room does a lot to reduce the tension on the “crew members”, and makes it a lot easier for them to just be chummy and wait things out rather than get into personality conflicts.

Still, a lot of good science will come out of this study, and as a bonus, Americans are not involved.

Face it, you guys act like you own space!

Moving into the realm of a more modest form of transportation than space flight, we have the first very preliminary positive results in trying to develop the “road train” concept.

The idea is fairly simple. Instead of thousands of people individually piloting their individual vehicles over the exact same roads in their daily commute every day, one lead car would do all the piloting and all the other cars would simply do what that car did until it’s time to drive from the car train’s route to your job.

Put another way… imagine that you are driving to work. But instead of driving the whole way, you sit by the side of the road for a minute waiting for the road train to go by, and then your car connects wireless to the road train and, all by itself, joins the train. You sit back, put your feet up, and relax, not doing a single thing to pilot your vehicle, until the system beeps and tells you it is time to drive from road train to work. Same thing on the way home.

Sounds cool, right? But something bugs me about this idea. It seems wrong somehow. Like a problem is either being half-solved, or over-solved.

For instance, how does it handle a red light, where half your road train will make the light and half won’t? If your road train is many blocks long, it could get sliced up in many places. What then?

And trusting some other person in the lead vehicle with your life and the life of all the other passive cars is one hell of a leap of faith to ask of people. I am not sure the ability to have an easy commute while not having to relinquish the autonomy og your own vehicle is really worth it.

And a surprising amount of progress had been made in creating the self-driving car lately anyhow. Perhaps this would make sense from the point of view of the traffic controlling computers in a full-on self-driving car scenario, but within the confines of the current everyday driving work, I don’t know.

Finally, from the real world to one of my favorite world, the world of video games, and one editorialist’s cautious endorsement of the future of 3D gaming.

I’ve been kind of dubious about the idea, informed largely by how excited everyone got about “virtual reality” way back in the 90’s. But the points he makes in its favour make sense to me.

One, he’s right to say that single-player gaming has no problem with 3D needing to be focused right for one person or one small part of the room. I play video games by myself, and that would not be a problem. It only has to be focused for my eyes.

And he’s somewhat correct in saying that gamers do not mind putting on dorky accessories to play games. Admittedly, headphones and wrist straps are a far cry from something that is going to completely cover my eyes and render me blind to my surroundings, but if the results were good enough, if I was sufficiently impressed and enchanted with this new level of immersion, I could get used to it.

His best point, and the one that really struck home for me, though, is that current 3D technology is a lot more convincing when applied to animation than to real objects, and what is a video game’s visuals but a constant flow of animation? It makes sense. Animation, unlike the real world, is simplified, has a single visual style, and uses fairly predictable tricks to simulate 3D. So why not turn those tricks into actual 3D visuals?

Of course, nothing 3D like that is going to be showing up in my price range (hint : LOW) any time soon. But still, it’s good to know that my beloved video games are ready to break into that third dimension.

Virtual reality, twenty years late.

One of the core concept underlying modern life is the idea of hard work. We work hard, we say, and that means we deserve certain things. You will rise to the top as long as you work hard. Everyone values a hard worker. We work hard for our money. And so on.

This concept underlies a lot of our beliefs about work and its role in society, and hence, our role in society as well. After all, if there is one thing that unites people, it’s that the vast majority of people have jobs. Even in tough economic times, no more than ten percent or so of the population is unemployed. The rest have jobs, bosses, responsibilities, stress, and the daily hurdle of convincing yourself to get up, get ready, and go to work when it’s the last thing in the world you feel like doing.

So the idea of hard work is key to the entire social machinery that society relies upon to function by putting what people do with most of their days on most days in some sort of meaningful context. Being a hard worker is a good thing. We want to be hard workers. So we get up and go to work.

But the fact is, modern life has made this concept practically meaningless, and it’s high time that we examined the concept and learned, for ourselves, what a leaky ship this tired old idea has become.

Hey, I work hard, right?

It’s something that nearly everyone says at one point. They work hard for their money. They work hard period. Generally, it’s said either defensively, or as a preface to their claim of some sort of entitlement, privilege, or special consideration from society.

But when you think about it, it’s a meaningless statement. Honestly, can you imagine a single person with an actual job who could say this and you would disagree to their face? You might think, naively, that their job doesn’t sound all that hard compared to yours, or that you are glad you don’t have that job because it sounds like it sucks hot rocks, but is there anyone with a job to whom you would say “Bull muffins, you don’t work hard for your money!”

Of course not. It would be extraordinarily rude and invite a lot of bitter comparisons and ill will. But if absolutely anybody who works for a living can make the exact same claim and have it go unchallenged, what does it really mean?

Basically, when you say “I work hard for a living”, all you are really saying is “I am employed.” It does nothing to distinguish you from anyone else with a job. Everyone who has a job works hard because everyone who has a job would rather not have to work for a living. It’s a meaningless distinction.

Work hard, and you’ll make it to the top!

It amazes me that some people still think this is true.

Think of your job. Now think of your boss. Do you really think he or she got where they are by working harder than everyone else?

That idiot? Not a chance. They just sucked up to the right people, made the right friends, and had less dignity and honor and self-respect than you. Them work hard? Hah.

Well, what makes you think it will be any different for you, or for everyone? The skills of your job and the skills that will actually get you promoted are not just entirely different, sometimes they are totally at odds with one another. Hard work barely makes the list.

And even if your boss is qualified and competent, do you really think it’s hard work which got them there? Imagine you are a boss with several employees. One of them is an amazingly hard worker who is more productive than two average employees. The other is an average worker, but everyone knows him and likes him, and he seems to be good at motivating people to work.

Who are you going to promote? One way, you lose all that productivity for your department and thrust someone who has never shown the slightest sign that they would make a good manager into a management position, and the other…. makes sense.

Hard work does not get you ahead. Social skills, maybe.

Society rewards hard workers

Society rewards work, in that our society works on a money-for-labour economy. But after that, hard work is one of the last things it rewards.

Think about it. Do you think someone who makes twice as much money as you do works twice as hard as you do? Are you paid less because you are just too lazy to work as hard at them?

Like hell, right? They just do different work than you. They are probably one of those middle-management suckups who don’t contribute anything to the bottom line and just serve to make sure the people at the top never have to talk to the people at the bottom and risk getting exposed to actual work.

Or even if they aren’t… why does a doctor make so much more than a McDonald’s employee? Is it because they work that much harder? Really? When a doctor can make more in four hours than the french fry chef at McDonald’s does in a month? We begin to suspect that there is something a little more than hardness of work at play here.

The answer, of course, is that the doctor makes more because he can get more. Society sees the job of doctor as more valuable and difficult as french fry cook, and so doctors can ask for a lot more money and get it. It’s a higher status job, and therefore gets paid more dollars. It’s that simple.

Doctors often argue that they get paid so much because they have people’s lives in their hands. And it’s true, they do. But so do a lot of other jobs that don’t get paid nearly as much. If a tow truck driver doesn’t attach that chain correctly, they could cause a huge traffic accident and kill dozens of people. If the cleaning staff skimps a little when cleaning a restaurant’s kitchen, the food could become contaminated and make hundreds of people very ill. Even that french fry cook could wreck people’s days by doing his job wrong and getting away with it.

But these jobs are not paid nearly as well, because in society, dirty, manual, labour-filled jobs are considered low-status and hence not paid very well. It doesn’t matter how hard our french fry cook works, he could be doing the work of three people and putting in eighty hours a week, doesn’t matter. The doctor is still going to make a hell of a lot more than him.

And how about those fatcat CEOs who make millions of dollars even if the company is in the red? Do you really think they work millions of times harder than you do? Or are they just raiding the piggy bank?

Hard workers are better citizens

Not so much better that we pay them more, of course. That would be silly.

But a lot of people seem to think that their stalwart claim that they are hard workers somehow makes them better than other people, and that means society should recognize and value and reward them above others.

But as we have already seen, it’s a meaningless distinction. Anyone can claim it, and nobody will challenge them, and so all you are really saying is “I have a job!”

And the strangest part is, the people making these claims are often conservatives. The self-same conservatives, mind you, who are so ready to defend social Darwinism, the law of the jungle, the market, and so on… and now they are saying that society should think they are special for being a good little worker and doing what they are told? And that this somehow makes them special?

What a bunch of collectivist bullcrap. Why should I care, Comrade, how good a worker you are? It doesn’t make my life any easier, nor does it put more money in my pocket. Unless I work with you directly and your quality of work (or lack of it) directly influences how much work I have to do, or how much stress I have to put up with, why should I give a crap how hard you work?

Admit it, you think you contribute more to society and therefore society should treat you nicer and make you feel all special. But unless you are willing to endorse the rest of the collectivist ideology that says we have a responsibility to help one another that supersedes our individual desires sometimes, like for instance our desire to make obscene amounts of money regardless of consequences… you might want to rethink just how proud you are for being better than the tiny proportion of people in society without jobs.

Hard work is a joke

So as you can see, despite the deep roots that the phrase “hard work” has in our culture, it’s really a joke. Society does not value or reward people based on how hard they worker, anyone can claim to be a hard worker and it doesn’t mean anything, and the idea of how wonderful it is to be a “hard worker” is a sham that serves the powers that be by making sure they get qas much labour for as little money as possible. You want to be a good person, right? So work harder for the same amount of money! Suits them just fine.

It’s really all about who has better social skills, who has a higher status job, and who has the power to vote themselves a raise. Hard work is barely a blip on the radar.

Enjoy your drive to work!

No really, you do.

See, you’re a human being. And human beings are social animals. That means we are born with a host of strong drives that bind us together into communities which work together toward common goals.

To be a human in modern society is to belong to many of these overlapping and interlocking communities, from apartments to internationally alliances, from families to Fortune 500 companies, from friendships to fraternities and well beyond.

And one of the most important drives which binds us together in so many ways is the our desire to contribute to the community we are in. We not only desire to belong to a community, we vitally need to devote our energies to said community. If we cannot, we feel empty, purposeless, and isolated.

Modern life does such a poor job of arranging for this deep need to be vitally met that most people think they only work for a living because society forces them to do so. They assume that if people did not need money in order to survive, life would be one long vacation that never ended.

This is a perfectly understandable from the point of view of the average tired, stressed, harried worker. Whether you are the mailroom drudge or the top boss, there are many days when you really don’t feel like going to work in the morning and wish you were anywhere else but at your job. The average person of today does not love their job, even if it’s the one they chose as a career in their college days, and from the point of view of the leisure deprived masses, an endless supply of what they feel they get so little of sounds like the best possible thing in the world.

It’s like a person suffering from dehydration thinking nothing could be better than a lake of their favorite beverage, or a child dreaming of a world of unlimited candy. It’s perfectly understandable. But in the end, it’s not really very realistic.

Realistically, eventually your need is sated and other drives come to the fore. You have enough to drink, you get tired of the candy…. and you have had enough vacation, and want to get back to work.

If you are still not convinced that we have a very strong drive to contribute our labour to a community, ask yourself this : why are little kids so eager to try to ‘help’? It is universally known that wee ones are always trying to participate in what the people around them are doing. They want to feel included and valued. It is only later in life that we become jaded and guarded and lose contact with this desire, as school, jobs, and other obligations put us into a permanent state of leisure deprivation, and we dream of that unlimited vacation with nothing to do and nobody to answer to at all.

But really, wouldn’t you get bored? Don’t you remember getting bored of summer as a kid and kind of wishing school would start again? If you could have the exact same income with no work, what, exactly, would you DO all day? There is no leisure activity which would not grow tiresome after a while. Sooner or later, just pleasing yourself would grow very boring, and you would get tired of deciding what to do with your time all the time, and you would look for something more meaningful to do.

This, incidentally, is a major cause of malaise amongst the wealthy, especially the so-called “leisure class”, especially amongst the generations which come after the founding of the family fortune. It is a patently cruel thing to expect human beings to do nothing meaningful with their lives simply to fulfill some ancient patriarch’s fantasy that “his children won’t have to work for a living”. And the cruelty is compounded tenfold by society’s firm insistence that their lives are wonderful, the best lives possible in our society, and how dare they not be blissfully happy when they are living out our dreams?

And this malaise plagues society in general, because our jobs are cold and impersonal and almost never give us the feeling that we are valued and recognized for our labour. They just reluctantly cut you a paycheck and that is supposed to be it.

And society on a larger scale requires nothing of us at all in terms of labour. It doesn’t even ask us to pay our taxes. It just takes them. In days gone by, our communities required some degree of labour from all citizens in order to function. In a primitive society, everyone has a defined role, things they are required to do in order to keep their society functioning. But in modern times, all we do is vote. One question asked of us every four years. That’s a fairly thin diet by anyone’s standards.

So really, you do want to work for a living. It’s just that modern society does such a lousy job of making you feel connected to your community and valued and recognized for your contributions that you lose sight of all that and dream, instead, of a permanent vacation which would likely turn into a nightmare.

The real secret is in doing what you want to do, not in doing nothing at all. And being a human being, what your want to do is work hard at something which is meaningful to you and be recognized and valued for it.

Human beings want, and need, to work.